GotenbergvsScienceClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gotenberg | ScienceClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 13 471 | 677 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 50/100 for ScienceClaw, so it is the safer default.
Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ScienceClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; ScienceClaw needs more configuration.
Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
Gotenberg details →ScienceClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Gotenberg, compare it with
Keep ScienceClaw, compare it with