# Gotenberg vs Quickstart

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gotenberg | Quickstart |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #60 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 468 ✓ | 206 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +317 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.16 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 52/100 for Quickstart, so it is the safer default.

Quickstart ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Gotenberg.

If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; Quickstart needs more configuration.

Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+317 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gotenberg](https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg.md)
- [Quickstart](https://selfhost.directory/project/quickstart) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quickstart.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gotenberg-vs-quickstart