# Gotenberg vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gotenberg | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 13 474 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ibl.ai/os.

If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gotenberg](https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gotenberg-vs-os-2