# Gotenberg vs Operant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gotenberg | Operant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 13 476 ✓ | 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.

Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.

If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.

Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gotenberg](https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg.md)
- [Operant](https://selfhost.directory/project/operant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gotenberg-vs-operant