# Gotenberg vs Mularr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gotenberg | Mularr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 13 474 ✓ | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.

Gotenberg ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mularr.

If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; Mularr needs more configuration.

Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gotenberg](https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gotenberg.md)
- [Mularr](https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gotenberg-vs-mularr