Gotenbergvsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gotenberg | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 13 476 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +320 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 22 |
| Latest release | v8.39.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.5.11 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Gotenberg scores 77/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Gotenberg.
If you want the quickest setup, Gotenberg is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.
Gotenberg is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
Gotenberg details →magic-frame details →
Swap a project
Keep Gotenberg, compare it with
Keep magic-frame, compare it with