google-webfonts-helpervsRAWGraphs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| google-webfonts-helper | RAWGraphs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 6 in Web Development | #3 of 7 in Data Visualization |
| GitHub stars | 13 072 | 9 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.2 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
google-webfonts-helper and RAWGraphs score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
google-webfonts-helper ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RAWGraphs.
If you want the quickest setup, google-webfonts-helper is easier to run; RAWGraphs needs more configuration.
google-webfonts-helper is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
google-webfonts-helper details →RAWGraphs details →
Swap a project
Keep google-webfonts-helper, compare it with
Keep RAWGraphs, compare it with