GogsvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+82 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →