Gogsvstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →tunesynctool details →