# Gogs vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-syncwatch