Gogsvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →supabase-automated-self-host details →