# Gogs vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 909 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v2.7.25 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

subarr ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-subarr