# Gogs vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +102 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-sonarqube