GogsvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →Scada-LTS details →