# Gogs vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-rudderstack