# Gogs vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor