# Gogs vs retroassembly

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | retroassembly |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 47 909 ✓ | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 ✓ | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-retroassembly