# Gogs vs racktables

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | racktables |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 813 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.

Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [racktables](https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-racktables