# Gogs vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 ✓ | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

Questarr ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-questarr