# Gogs vs ProxMenux

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | ProxMenux |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #2 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 3 243 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.

Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ProxMenux.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; ProxMenux needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [ProxMenux](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-proxmenux