# Gogs vs Nightingale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | Nightingale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

Nightingale ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-nightingale