# Gogs vs namer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | namer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 ✓ | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 ✓ | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; namer needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-namer