GogsvsLiquidsoap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | Liquidsoap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +74 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
Liquidsoap ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
Gogs is growing faster right now (+74 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →Liquidsoap details →