# Gogs vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 906 ✓ | 30 106 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +82 | +707 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+707 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-infisical