GogsvsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 905 | 30 096 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +697 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 79 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+697 stars in 30 days).
Gogs details →Infisical details →