# Gogs vs Incus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | Incus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 905 ✓ | 6 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +81 | +275 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 75/100 for Incus, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Gogs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.

Incus is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-incus