# Gogs vs growthbook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Gogs | growthbook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 47 909 ✓ | 8 547 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +122 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)
- [growthbook](https://selfhost.directory/project/growthbook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/growthbook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gogs-vs-growthbook