Gogsvsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Gogs | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 47 907 | 8 546 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +121 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Gogs scores 80/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.
Gogs details →growthbook details →