# GoAccess vs static_status

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GoAccess | static_status |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 093 ✓ | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +145 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

GoAccess scores 75/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.

GoAccess is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GoAccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess.md)
- [static_status](https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/goaccess-vs-static-status