# GoAccess vs runitor

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GoAccess | runitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 094 ✓ | 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | 0BSD |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

GoAccess scores 75/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.

runitor ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for GoAccess.

If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.

GoAccess is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GoAccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess.md)
- [runitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/runitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/goaccess-vs-runitor