# GoAccess vs Kula

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GoAccess | Kula |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #16 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 093 ✓ | 1 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +145 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 0.21.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

GoAccess scores 75/100 against 55/100 for Kula, so it is the safer default.

Kula ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for GoAccess.

If you want the quickest setup, Kula is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.

GoAccess is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GoAccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess.md)
- [Kula](https://selfhost.directory/project/kula) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kula.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/goaccess-vs-kula