# GoAccess vs issue-status

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GoAccess | issue-status |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #31 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 094 ✓ | 429 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +146 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

GoAccess scores 75/100 against 47/100 for issue-status, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, issue-status is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.

GoAccess is growing faster right now (+146 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GoAccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess.md)
- [issue-status](https://selfhost.directory/project/issue-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/issue-status.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/goaccess-vs-issue-status