# go2rtc vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 14 528 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-wyoming-piper