# go2rtc vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 14 520 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-woodpecker-ci