go2rtcvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 526 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Winter CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with