# go2rtc vs wanderer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 518 ✓ | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +272 ✓ | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.

wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+272 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [wanderer](https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-wanderer