# go2rtc vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 14 528 ✓ | 1 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

usque ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; usque needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-usque