# go2rtc vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 14 522 ✓ | 1 360 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +276 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+276 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-tapflow