go2rtcvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 14 528 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 74/100 for go2rtc, so it is the safer default.
SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with