# go2rtc vs Pulumi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 14 519 | 25 825 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulumi scores 78/100 against 74/100 for go2rtc, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Pulumi needs more configuration.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [Pulumi](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-pulumi