go2rtcvsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 14 524 | 40 497 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +278 | +588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3504 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3894.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PostHog scores 81/100 against 74/100 for go2rtc, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3504 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
PostHog is growing faster right now (+588 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →PostHog details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep PostHog, compare it with