# go2rtc vs Payload CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 14 520 | 45 559 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +647 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 74/100 for go2rtc, so it is the safer default.

Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Payload CMS needs more configuration.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+647 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-payload-cms