go2rtcvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 14 519 | 17 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 16 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.0.7 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 74/100 for go2rtc, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →Nomad details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep Nomad, compare it with