# go2rtc vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 527 | 46 468 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +1 324 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 74/100 for go2rtc, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-mitmproxy