# go2rtc vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | go2rtc | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 528 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

go2rtc scores 74/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

MikroDash ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.

go2rtc is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [go2rtc](https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/go2rtc.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/go2rtc-vs-mikrodash