# glusterfs vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | glusterfs | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

glusterfs and Urbit score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.

glusterfs is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [glusterfs](https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/glusterfs-vs-urbit