# glusterfs vs Tailscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | glusterfs | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 38 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +1 447 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tailscale scores 84/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.

Tailscale ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.

If you want the quickest setup, Tailscale is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.

Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [glusterfs](https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs.md)
- [Tailscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tailscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/glusterfs-vs-tailscale