# glusterfs vs Syslog-ng

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | glusterfs | Syslog-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 ✓ | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.

Syslog-ng ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.

If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.

glusterfs is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [glusterfs](https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs.md)
- [Syslog-ng](https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/glusterfs-vs-syslog-ng