# glusterfs vs jenkins

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | glusterfs | jenkins |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 26 703 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +117 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 32 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

jenkins scores 82/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.

jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.

If you want the quickest setup, jenkins is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.

jenkins is growing faster right now (+117 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [glusterfs](https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs.md)
- [jenkins](https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jenkins.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/glusterfs-vs-jenkins