# glusterfs vs Gogs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | glusterfs | Gogs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 47 907 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +75 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | latest-commit-build · 17 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Gogs scores 80/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.

Gogs ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.

If you want the quickest setup, Gogs is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.

Gogs is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [glusterfs](https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/glusterfs.md)
- [Gogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gogs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/glusterfs-vs-gogs